surgical
audit is a process used by clinicians who seek to improve patient care.
The process
involves comparing aspects of care(structure, process and outcome) against
explicit criteria. keeping track of personal outcome data and contributing to a
clinical database ensures that a surgeon's own performance is monitored
continuously and can be compared with a national data set to ensure compliance
with agreed standards
If the
care falls short of the criteria choosen, some change in the way that care is
organised should be proposed . This change may be required at one of many
levels. it might be an individual who needs training or an instrument that
needs replacing. at times, the change may need to take place at the team
levels.
Sometimes, the only appropriate action is change at an
institutional level(eg-a new antibiotic policy), regional level (provision of a
tertiary referral centre) or indeed, national level (screening programmes and
health education campaigns).
Essentially two types of audits may be encountered: national audits( eg- in the
UK, the national institute for health and clinical excellence-NICE) and
local/hospital audits.
Both
are designed to improve the quality of care.
In an ideal world,
national audits should be driven by needs identified in local and hospital
based audits that are closest to the patient. For example, hospital topics are
often identified at the departmental morbidity and mortality meetings, where
issues related to patient care are discussed .
The
reporting process might identify a possible national issue, and a national
audit could be designed to be completed by the local audit department and
surgical teams.
Audits
are formal processes that require a structure . the following steps are
essential to establish an audit cycle:-
1.
Define the audit question in a multidisciplinary teams.
2.
Identify the body of evidence and current standards.
3.
Design the audit to measure performance against agreed standard based on
strong evidence. Seek appropriate advice(local audit department in UK)
4.
Measure over an agreed interval.
5.
Analyse results and compare performance against agreed standards.
6.
Undertake gap analysis- a) if all standards are reached, reaudit after
an agreed interval. b) if there is a need for improvement, identify possible
interventions and agree with the involved parties.
Reaudit.